A comprehensive AI agent skill for creating and delivering presentations that actually work. Builds your narrative from scratch, structures slides for clarit...
Every organization has a graveyard of presentations that were opened once, skimmed, and never thought about again. Decks that took days to build and thirty seconds to dismiss. Slides that contained accurate information organized in a way that communicated nothing. Beautifully formatted documents that answered questions nobody was asking.
The failure is almost never the information. It is the structure. Information without narrative is a database. A presentation is not a database. It is an argument — a sequence of ideas arranged deliberately to move an audience from where they are to where you need them to be.
Most presentations fail because they were built as information delivery systems rather than persuasion systems. This skill builds persuasion systems.
The slide deck is not where a presentation begins. It is where a presentation ends — the visual artifact of a thinking process that should happen entirely before any software is opened.
The thinking process starts with three questions. What does your audience believe before this presentation begins. What do you need them to believe, decide, or do when it ends. What is the shortest path between those two points.
The shortest path is your narrative. Every slide either advances that narrative or it does not belong. Every sentence in your speaker notes either supports that narrative or it is noise. Every minute of your allotted time either moves the audience closer to the destination or it moves them away from it.
The skill builds your narrative before your deck. It asks the questions that surface what you are actually trying to accomplish, who you are trying to accomplish it with, and what the most direct path to that outcome looks like. The deck follows from the narrative rather than the narrative emerging, hopefully, from the deck.
A slide has one job: to support what you are saying right now, not to contain everything relevant to the topic.
The most common slide failure is the slide that tries to do too much — that contains the full argument, the supporting data, the caveats, and the conclusion all at once, leaving the audience to read while you talk and ensuring that they are always either ahead of you or behind you and never with you.
The skill structures slides around the principle that the slide and the speaker should be doing different things simultaneously. You carry the narrative. The slide carries the evidence, the visual, or the single idea that makes your current point land more clearly than words alone can. When they are doing the same thing — when the audience can get everything from the slide without listening to you — one of them is redundant.
For each section of your presentation it builds the minimum number of slides needed to make the point effectively, with the minimum content on each slide needed to support what you are saying, organized in the sequence that produces the clearest understanding.
Data in a presentation is not decoration. It is evidence for a specific claim. The question every data slide should answer before it is built is: what claim does this data support, and is this the most compelling way to make that claim visual?
Most data slides answer a different question: what data do I have that is relevant to this topic? The result is charts that display information without making an argument, tables that require the audience to do the analytical work themselves, and visualizations that are technically accurate and practically useless.
The skill helps you build data slides that make the argument rather than presenting the evidence and hoping the audience draws the right conclusion. The chart type that makes the pattern visible rather than the chart type that displays the most information. The annotation that tells the audience what to see rather than leaving them to find it. The comparison that makes the point immediate rather than the absolute number that requires context the audience may not have.
Speaker notes written the way most people write them — full sentences transcribed from the intended speech — produce a specific kind of delivery. The speaker reads. The audience watches someone read. The connection that a live presentation should create never forms.
The skill writes speaker notes that function as prompts rather than scripts. The opening phrase that gets you started. The transition that moves you from one idea to the next. The specific example you intend to use and the point it is supposed to make. The key phrase that anchors the most important idea on each slide.
These notes are written in your voice — the way you actually talk about this material, not the way a document would describe it. They support delivery rather than replacing it.
The questions after a presentation are where credibility is established or lost. A presenter who handles questions fluently — who anticipated what would be asked, who knows the material deeply enough to engage rather than deflect, who can say I do not know and will find out without losing authority — leaves a stronger impression than one who delivered a flawless prepared section and fell apart when the script ended.
The skill generates the questions your specific presentation will face. Not generic questions about the topic, but the questions this audience will ask given what you told them and what you did not tell them. The skeptical question from the person who is not yet convinced. The detailed question from the person who wants to go deeper than your slides allowed. The political question from the person whose priorities were not addressed. The obvious question you forgot to answer.
For each one it helps you prepare a response that is honest, specific, and advances your objective rather than merely defending your position.
A presentation that is well-structured, clearly designed, and poorly delivered has not achieved its purpose. Delivery is not performance. It is the discipline of being genuinely present with an audience — of speaking to people rather than at them, of pausing long enough to let important ideas settle, of making eye contact that communicates engagement rather than scanning that communicates anxiety.
The skill helps you prepare for delivery through practice rather than hope. It identifies the sections of your presentation where the material is most complex and the delivery most needs to be clear. It helps you find the pace that communicates confidence without rushing. It prepares you for the opening — the first thirty seconds where first impressions form — and the close — the last thirty seconds where the call to action needs to land cleanly.
A presentation that ends when you leave the room has left value on the table. The follow-up — the document, the email, the summary, the next step — is where the decision you were building toward gets made or deferred.
The skill builds the follow-up materials that extend the impact of your presentation beyond the room. The one-page summary for people who were not there. The email that captures the key points and the specific next step you are requesting. The leave-behind that gives your audience something to reference when they are making the decision you were building toward.
The presentation opens the door. The follow-up is what walks through it.
ZIP package — ready to use