Follow this workflow end-to-end unless the user explicitly asks to skip steps

1) Intake and scope

• Confirm input artifacts: TeX source path(s), PDF path, supplementary files, target repository, and expected outputs.
• State assumptions explicitly when information is missing.
• Keep approach adaptable to the specific paper; do not force a fixed dependency stack or rigid project template.
• Check whether the working folder already contains paper source files (.tex, .bib, style files, figures).
• Source priority rule:
  • If usable TeX source files are present, use TeX as the primary source for reproduction.
  • If TeX is absent or incomplete for key content, fall back to PDF extraction only for missing parts.

2) Source extraction (TeX-first, PDF fallback)

• TeX-first path (preferred):

  • Parse and read the main TeX project structure first (main.tex or equivalent entry file and includes).
  • Preserve original scientific wording when converting relevant content to Markdown notes.
  • Resolve equations, theorem blocks, citations, and appendices from source files whenever possible.
  • Record unresolved include/bibliography issues explicitly; do not invent missing content.

• PDF fallback path (required when TeX is unavailable/incomplete):

  • Extract paper content page by page into Markdown, preserving the original wording.
  • Do not summarize, paraphrase, or rewrite scientific statements.
  • Preserve structure faithfully:
    • Title, authors, affiliations, abstract, sections, subsections.
    • Equations (LaTeX-friendly when possible), theorem/lemma/proposition blocks.
    • Tables, figure captions, references, appendices, footnotes.
  • If a PDF is scanned or partially unreadable:
    • Run OCR and mark uncertain spans clearly.
    • Never silently invent missing text.
  • Include image references/placeholders when figures cannot be represented as plain text.
  • Produce one primary output file such as paper_fulltext.md.

3) Extraction quality checks

• Validate completeness before moving to reproduction:
  • Section/headings coverage matches the TeX project or PDF source used.
  • Key equations and algorithm blocks are present.
  • References and appendices are included if present in the source.
• Report known extraction limitations and exact affected files/pages/segments.

4) Reproduction planning (paper-specific)

• Build a reproduction plan from the extracted source materials (TeX-derived notes and/or Markdown), not from memory.
• Identify:
  • Problem definition, notation, assumptions, and objective functions.
  • Algorithm steps and required components.
  • Dataset generation/loading, training/optimization, and evaluation protocol.
  • Baselines and ablations required for faithful reproduction.
• If details are missing or ambiguous, call out the gap and provide a conservative implementation choice with rationale.

5) Python implementation principles

• Implement with modular design and clear boundaries:
  • Separate concerns (data, models/algorithms, training/solver loop, evaluation, utils, config).
  • Prefer low coupling and high cohesion.
• Avoid monolithic scripts:
  • Split code into modules whenever responsibilities can be separated.
  • Prefer one clear responsibility per file.
• File size guideline:
  • Keep a single source file under ~200 lines whenever practical.
  • If a file grows beyond ~200 lines, refactor into submodules unless there is a clear reason not to.
• Keep dependencies minimal and paper-driven; choose tools based on the paper's actual needs.
• Avoid over-engineering early; start from the minimum reproducible core, then extend.
• Add tests/checks for critical math or pipeline steps where feasible.
• Preserve reproducibility:
  • deterministic seeds when applicable,
  • explicit config for key hyperparameters,
  • clear experiment entry points.

6) README header requirements (paper metadata)

• Every reproduction project README must start with paper metadata before any other content:

  • Paper title (original title as published)
  • Authors (full names, affiliations, and email addresses if available)
  • Abstract (verbatim copy of the original abstract)

• For README_zh-CN.md:

  • Paper title: provide Chinese translation if original is in English; keep original if paper is in Chinese.
  • Authors: keep original names and affiliations; translate country/region names if needed.
  • Abstract: provide faithful Chinese translation of the abstract.

• Format example (English README):

  # [Paper Title]
  
  **Authors:** Author Name¹, Co-Author Name²
  **Affiliations:**
  ¹ Department, University, Country (email@university.edu)
  ² Lab, Institution, Country (email@institution.edu)
  
  ## Abstract
  
  [Verbatim abstract text from the paper]
  
  ---
  
  [Then reproduction project content begins...]
  

7) README update requirements (bilingual + images)

• Generate and maintain two README files after code changes:
  • README.md (English original)
  • README_zh-CN.md (Chinese translation aligned with the English version)
• After the paper metadata header, ensure both files include:
  • paper citation and target claims to reproduce,
  • environment/setup commands,
  • project structure overview and module responsibilities,
  • how to run main experiments,
  • expected outputs/metrics and where artifacts are saved,
  • known deviations from the paper and why.
• Insert generated figures/images into both README files using valid relative Markdown image paths.
• Image output granularity rule: unless multi-panel comparison is explicitly needed, save one chart per image file (one figure per file).
• Keep both README files aligned with actual code paths and commands.
• Keep Chinese content as faithful translation of English technical content (no missing key steps).

8) Output contract

• Deliver:
  • source-derived extraction notes/file(s) (TeX-first, PDF fallback when needed),
  • implemented/updated Python code,
  • README.md and README_zh-CN.md with embedded generated images.
• Clearly separate:
  • exact extracted content (verbatim from source),
  • your implementation notes and engineering decisions.
• Report reproduction status:
  • which claims/experiments were successfully reproduced,
  • known gaps or deviations from paper results, with reasons.